two theories & a constructive idea
You know, I’ve been thinking about the apparent abandonment of the ‘non-essential features are best as plugins’ policy (first, spellcheck, now widgets) and I think it’s to make things nice and smooth for the wordpress.com users as they take off the training wheels and move on to their own server. They would, after all, be bitterly disappointed if they made the leap and then found out some of their features had gone (as disappointed as when they first found out they couldn’t change their header image here, probably) and that the only way of getting them back was to mess with icky stuff like winzip and FTP. Like, eeeew.
My other theory at the moment is that theme designers are being pressured into widgetization so that the admins will have less work to do should they decide, in the near future, to introduce a wider choice of themes for paid users. Theme choice could be to wordpress what icons are to livejournal; the killer feature which’ll persuade people to part with their cash. I bet I get told I’m wrong about this, but then this time last year Matt was saying it was better to take money from spammers than VCs, so, you know, things change.
My constructive idea of the day is that if Automattic want widgetful themes they can sponsor a lucrative prize in the theme competition, and that if
still wishes to have the Perfect Theme With Support For Deprecated Tags she should bung them a book or something.